The effect of two different strateg

The effect of two different strategies aiming at increasinghousehold source-separation of food waste were assessed througha case-study in a residential area in Sweden were investigated; (a)use of written information distributed as leaflets amongst households and (b) installation of source-segregation equipment inkitchens, with the aim of increasing convenience sorting of foodwaste. Results show that distribution of written information material suggest that this campaign not resulted in neither a significantincreased amount of separately collected food waste, nor anincreased source-separation ratio. However, after installation ofsorting equipment in all households in the area, both the sourceseparation ratio as well as the amount of separately collected foodwaste increased vastly. Changes were consistent also months afterthe installation of sorting equipment in the area. Results supportprevious findings emphasising the importance of accessibility, convenience and existence of necessary infrastructure to participate inhousehold waste recycling. However, waste management systemsrelying on source-separation must recognize the importance ofconvenience for waste sorting also inside the very household. Findings in the present study can also be seen in the light of a construction of social norms around waste recycling, which through thestrategy used in this case-study are introduced in the householdin a very concrete manner.

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

The effect of two different strategies aiming at increasing
household source-separation of food waste were assessed through
a case-study in a residential area in Sweden were investigated; (a)
use of written information distributed as leaflets amongst households and (b) installation of source-segregation equipment in
kitchens, with the aim of increasing convenience sorting of food
waste. Results show that distribution of written information material suggest that this campaign not resulted in neither a significant
increased amount of separately collected food waste, nor an
increased source-separation ratio. However, after installation of
sorting equipment in all households in the area, both the sourceseparation ratio as well as the amount of separately collected food
waste increased vastly. Changes were consistent also months after
the installation of sorting equipment in the area. Results support
previous findings emphasising the importance of accessibility, convenience and existence of necessary infrastructure to participate in
household waste recycling. However, waste management systems
relying on source-separation must recognize the importance of
convenience for waste sorting also inside the very household. Findings in the present study can also be seen in the light of a construction of social norms around waste recycling, which through the
在這種情況下，研究中使用的策略在家庭中引入
一個非常具體的方式。

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

兩種旨在增加的不同策略的效果
家庭來源-食物廢物的分類評估通過
調查了瑞典一個住宅區的個案研究;（a）
在家庭中使用作為傳單分發的書面資料，以及（b） 在
廚房，目的是增加方便食品分類
浪費。結果顯示，分發書面資訊材料表明，這一活動沒有導致
單獨收集的食物廢物量增加，也未
增加源分離比。但是，在安裝
該地區所有家庭的分類設備，包括來源分離率以及單獨收集的食品數量
浪費大大增加。更改也是在幾個月後一致的
在該地區安裝分揀設備。結果支援
先前的調查結果強調無障礙、便利和存在必要的基礎設施的重要性，以便參與
家庭垃圾回收。然而，廢物管理系統
依靠源分離必須認識到
方便廢物分類也內部非常家庭。本研究的結果也可以從圍繞廢物回收的社會規範的構建中看，通過
本案例研究中使用的策略在家庭中引入
以非常具體的方式。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

兩種不同增長策略的效果
食物垃圾的家庭來源分離通過
對瑞典某住宅區的一個案例進行了調查；（a）
使用作為傳單分發給家庭的書面資訊，以及（b）在
廚房，旨在新增食物分類的便利性
浪費。結果表明，書面資訊資料的分發表明，這場運動並沒有導致
新增單獨收集的食物垃圾數量，或
提高了源分離比。但是，在安裝
該地區所有家庭的分類設備，包括食物來源分離率和單獨收集食物的數量
浪費大量新增。幾個月後的變化也是一致的
在該區域安裝分揀設備。成果支持
先前的研究結果強調了無障礙、便利和參與的必要基礎設施的存在的重要性
生活垃圾回收。然而，廢物管理系統
依靠源頭分離必須認識到
垃圾分類的便利性也體現在家庭內部。本研究的發現也可以從圍繞廢物回收的社會規範的構建中看出，通過
本案例研究中使用的策略是在家庭中介紹的
以非常具體的管道。