鉴于ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT公司与CHEMICAL

鉴于ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT公司与CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS公司的纠纷，ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT的两个股东，TIAN WEIJUAN和JOHN ROCHMAN各持有不同意见。虽然TIAN WEIJUAN不同意起诉CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS到法庭，但由于JOHN ROCHMAN已经在没有经TIAN WEIJUAN同意的情况下，独自起诉CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS到法庭，为维护双方几年的合作关系，现经过友好协商，两股东达成如下协议；
1.TIAN WEIJUAN不同意起诉CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS，JOHN ROCHMAN起诉CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS到法庭是他的个人行为。
2.ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT公司与CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS的案子所有的花费由JOHN ROCHMAN个人承担，所得的补偿亦由JOHN ROCHMAN享有。
3.目前为止，与CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS公司及相关公司的所有业务都已经成功结束，无任何纠纷。如果由这次纠纷引起CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS公司及相关公司的无理纠缠，一切后果由JOHN ROCHMAN个人承担，而不是由公司承担。
4.TIAN WEIJUAN辞去DIRECTOR职位，原因仅是为维护JOHN ROCHMAN起诉行为的合法性。
后续公司运行仍按各50%股权行使权利。

結果 (英文) 1:

View ISMILE GROUP. PTY. LIMIT company and CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS disputes, ISMILE GROUP. PTY. LIMIT of two shareholders, TIAN WEIJUAN and JOHN ROCHMAN hold different views. Although TIAN WEIJUAN agreed to prosecute CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS to the Court, but JOHN ROCHMAN already in case of no consent of the TIAN WEIJUAN, prosecuting CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS to court alone to maintain bilateral cooperation for several years, through friendly negotiation, two shareholders agree as follows;1.TIAN WEIJUAN disagree with prosecuting CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS,JOHN ROCHMAN charged CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS it is his personal conduct.2.ISMILE GROUP. PTY. LIMIT company and CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS's case all the costs borne by JOHN ROCHMAN, the compensation paid from JOHN ROCHMAN.3. so far, and related companies of all business with CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS have been completed successfully without any dispute. If the dispute caused whims CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS Corporation and its related companies, JOHN ROCHMAN personally liable for all the consequences, and not be borne by the company.4.TIAN WEIJUAN resigned as DIRECTOR positions, only reason is to preserve JOHN ROCHMAN legality of the prosecution.Follow-up the 50% shares of the company will go on right.

結果 (英文) 2:

Given ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS company and the company's disputes, the two shareholders ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT, TIAN WEIJUAN and JOHN ROCHMAN each holding different views. Although TIAN WEIJUAN do not agree with the prosecution CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS to court, but in the absence JOHN ROCHMAN has been TIAN WEIJUAN consent alone prosecute CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS to court to safeguard both years of partnership, now through friendly consultations, the two shareholders reach following agreement;
1.TIAN WEIJUAN disagree prosecution CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS, JOHN ROCHMAN CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS prosecution to the court is his personal behavior.
All company and spend 2.ISMILE GROUP.PTY.LIMIT CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS JOHN ROCHMAN case be borne by the individual, the income compensation increased from JOHN ROCHMAN enjoy.
3. So far, with CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS company and all business-related companies have been successfully concluded, without any dispute. If the dispute caused by the Company and related companies CHEMICAL WHAREHOUS unreasonable struggle, all the consequences borne by JOHN ROCHMAN individual, not by the company.
4.TIAN WEIJUAN resigned DIRECTOR jobs only reason for maintaining JOHN ROCHMAN to prosecute the perpetrators of legitimacy.
Upon the subsequent exercise of the right to run the company, 50% stake.

結果 (英文) 3:

鉴于Ismile集团。公司限制公司与化学wharehous公司的纠纷，Ismile集团有限公司限的两个股东，田微卷和约翰罗克曼各持有不同意见。虽然田微卷不同意起诉化学wharehous到法庭，但由于约翰罗克曼已经在没有经田微卷同意的情况下，独自起诉化学wharehous到法庭，为维护双方几年的合作关系，现经过友好协商，两股东达成如下协议；1.tian微卷不同意起诉化学wharehous，约翰罗克曼起诉化学wharehous到法庭是他的个人行为。2.ismile集团有限公司限公司与化学wharehous的案子所有的花费由约翰罗克曼个人承担，所得的补偿亦由约翰罗克曼享有。3。目前为止，与化学wharehous公司及相关公司的所有业务都已经成功结束，无任何纠纷。如果由这次纠纷引起化学wharehous公司及相关公司的无理纠缠，一切后果由约翰罗克曼个人承担，而不是由公司承担。4.tian微卷辞去主任职位，原因仅是为维护约翰罗克曼起诉行为的合法性。50%股权行使权利后续公司运行仍按各。