本文主要运用硬性指标和软性指标两个准则去解决所要求的基本模型。硬性指标

本文主要运用硬性指标和软性指标两个准则去解决所要求的基本模型。硬性指标是指通过增值性评价方法，由教练的执教场数、获胜场数及获胜率等三个指标来共同衡量。而软性指标则运用了层次分析法，并依据教练员评价系统中操作的多主体评价指标体系求出每项指标的权重分布，客观分析软性指标中各要素重点与非重点的比例关系，从而得到了充分反映教练员能力素质的评估模型。具体考虑的因素有以下几个方面。

結果 (英文) 1:

This article mainly uses two criteria to rate of soft targets and indicators addressing the requirements of the basic model. Hard targets is through value added assessment methods taught by coach number, number of WINS and winning percentage, three indicators to the common measure. While soft indicators using the analytic hierarchy process, and according to the coaches ' evaluation system of evaluation index system for operation of the principal finds the weight distribution of each indicator, objective analysis of soft key and non-key indicators of factors relation to fully reflect the coaches ' ability to assess the quality of models. The specific factors to be considered in the following areas.

結果 (英文) 2:

In this paper, the use of hard targets and soft targets to solve two criteria required for the basic model. Hard targets is through value-added evaluation method, by three indicators coach coaching field number, the number of winning games and winning rate to common measure. The use of soft indicators are AHP and evaluation system based on multi-agent systems operating in the coaches evaluate each indicator calculated redistribution rights, priorities and objective analysis of the various elements of the ratio between non-key soft indicators, thus been fully reflected in the coaches competency assessment model. Specific factors to consider are the following aspects.

結果 (英文) 3:

This paper mainly use the rigid and flexible index two criteria required to solve the basic model. Rigid index refers to the value-added evaluation method, by head coach field number, wins and winning rate of three common indicators to measure. And the soft indexes by AHP, and based on the operation of the coaches in the evaluation system of multi-agent evaluation index system for calculating the weight distribution of each index, objective analysis of each factor index in soft focus and non focus ratio, which is fully reflect the coaches evaluation ability quality model. Specific factors considered are the following several aspects.