Studies relying on rating scales fe

Studies relying on rating scales feature most prominently in the HCI literature, and several of these have been found to correlate well with one another, suggesting that they are tapping into the same concept.
In his chapter, Tractinsky draws attention to the problematic issue of competing concepts that are not mutually exclusive, and which therefore causes confusion among researchers, students, and evaluators alike.
The confusion concerns a conceptual overlap between Lavie and Tractinsky’s ‘classical’ aesthetics scale and traditional usability.

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

研究依托評定量表功能最突出的HCI文學和其中的幾個已經發現彼此很好的相關性，這表明他們正在利用同一個概念。
在他的一章，Tractinsky提請注意競爭的棘手的問題概念不是相互排斥的，並因此導致研究人員，學生之間的混亂，評估的一致好評。
混亂涉及拉維和Tractinsky的“經典”美學規模和傳統可用性之間的概念重疊。

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

依靠評級尺度研究特徵最突出的HCI文學，有些已被發現與另一個關聯，這表明它們是利用相同的概念。在那一章，Tractinsky提請注意競爭的概念並不相互排斥的問題，並囙此引起混亂，研究人員，學生，和評估一樣。混亂涉及概念之間的重疊Lavie和Tractinsky的古典美學尺度和傳統的可用性。