圖 5 主要是根據題2問卷調查（RFID：26%；QR碼： 24%）。

圖 5 主要是根據題2問卷調查（RFID：26%；QR碼： 24%）。很明顯地，「以上兩個選項首選原因，至多占了快五成的回應率，佔據物聯網在年輕族群方面市場較廣泛，也間接證明物聯網大眾化，不再是觸手不及的高科技。

結果 (英文) 1:

FIG 5 is a main problem 2 Questionnaire (RFID: 26%; QR Code: 24%). Obviously, "more than two options made the choice, accounting for up to a response rate of nearly 50 percent of the occupied younger things in terms of the broader market, but also indirectly proved popular things, no longer tentacles less than high-tech.

結果 (英文) 2:

Figure 5 is based on a questionnaire survey of question 2 (RFID: 26%; QR code: 24%). It is clear that "the preferred reason for these two options, at most, accounts for up to 50% of the response rate, accounting for the Internet of Things in the young ethnic groups of the market is more extensive, but also indirectly proved that the popularity of the Internet of Things, is no longer a high-tech."

結果 (英文) 3:

Figure 5 is mainly based on the questionnaire survey of question 2 (RFID: 26%; QR Code: 24%). It is obvious that "the above two options account for at most 50% of the response rate. They occupy a wide market of Internet of things in young people, which indirectly proves that the popularity of Internet of things is no longer a high-tech that is not as good as its hands.".