鑑於優先考慮這四種Wte技術，採用了基於多標準決策（MCDM）模型的方

鑑於優先考慮這四種Wte技術，採用了基於多標準決策（MCDM）模型的方法。該方法考慮到該國獨特的社會經濟，環境和技術前景，以及SWM和發電領域的主要專家的判斷。確定了模型所必需且與不同Wte技術評估相關的決策標準。根據所選的決策標準對四種已確定的技術和數據收集進行了審查。從技術中收集的數據以及文獻綜述被插入模型中，並比較了毛里求斯的不同Wte技術。結果是確定了毛里求斯優先使用的Wte技術。優先研究了優先技術帶來的環境和經濟利益，包括避免了甲烷排放，淨二氧化碳2當量排放量，年發電量以及避免在火力發電廠中燃燒重燃料油（HFO）所產生的經濟節省。確定了與所選技術有關的障礙，並提出了將這些障礙轉化為措施的建議。用於研究目的的方法流程圖如圖1所示。

結果 (英文) 1:

Given the priority of the four Wte technology, using a method based on multi-criteria decision-making models (MCDM). This method takes into account the unique Shehuijingji judgment, environmental and technological prospects, as well as leading experts in the field of SWM and power generation in the country. Necessary to determine the model and decision criteria associated with different technical assessment of Wte. According to the decision of the four selected criteria established technology and data collection were examined. And literature review data collected from the art is inserted into the model and compared Mauritius Wte different techniques. The result is determined Wte technology used to Mauritius priority. The priority research priority technology to bring environmental and economic benefits, including the avoidance of methane emissions, the net carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, the annual generating capacity of the economy and avoid saving combustion of heavy fuel oil (HFO) generated in the thermal power plant. Identified barriers related to the selected technology, and presents these obstacles into action recommendations. A method for research purposes in the flowchart shown in Fig.

結果 (英文) 2:

Given the priority given to these four Wte technologies, a multi-standard decision-making (MCDM) approach is used. The methodology takes into account the country's unique socio-economic, environmental and technological prospects, as well as the judgement of key experts in the field of SWM and power generation. Determined the decision criteria that are necessary for the model and are related to different Wte technical evaluations. Four identified technologies and data collection were reviewed against the selected decision criteria. Data collected from the technology, as well as literature reviews, were inserted into the model and the different Wte techniques in Mauritius were compared. The result was the identification of the Wte technology, which was preferred in Mauritius. Priority was given to the environmental and economic benefits of priority technologies, including avoidance of methane emissions, net CO2 equivalent emissions, annual power generation and economic savings from burning heavy fuel oil (HFO) in coal-fired power plants. Obstacles related to the technology selected were identified and recommendations were made to translate them into measures. The method flowchart for research purposes is shown in Figure 1.

結果 (英文) 3:

In view of the priority given to these four WTE technologies, a method based on multi criteria decision making (MCDM) model is adopted. The approach takes into account the country's unique socio-economic, environmental and technological prospects, as well as the judgment of key experts in the field of SWM and power generation. The decision criteria necessary for the model and related to the evaluation of different WTE technologies are determined. Four identified technologies and data collection were reviewed against selected decision criteria. Data collected from the technology and literature review were inserted into the model, and different WTE technologies in Mauritius were compared. As a result, the preferred WTE technology in Mauritius was identified. The environmental and economic benefits of priority technologies, including avoidance of methane emissions, net CO2 equivalent emissions, annual power generation, and economic savings from combustion of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in thermal power plants, have been prioritized. The barriers associated with the selected technology were identified and suggestions were made to translate them into measures. The method flow chart for research purposes is shown in Figure 1.