(the degree to which mobile payment is reconcilable with existingvalues, behavioral patterns, and experiences), individual mobility(the degree to which an individual pursues a mobile lifestyle),and subjective norm (the degree to which the social environmentperceives mobile payment as desirable).This article has two main contributions. From a conceptualviewpoint, we develop a model that is based on various theoretical fields which are relevant to the consumer motives for usingmobile payment solutions. This allows us to draw a broaderand more holistic picture of the drivers of consumer acceptanceof mobile payment services compared to previous research. Froman empirical viewpoint, we make a contribution by testing thismodel with a large sample, which enables us to conduct severalstability tests in order to increase confidence in the findings. Providing reliable, confirmatory evidence regarding the relevance ofvarious acceptance factors is particularly important since prior research on mobile payment has primarily been qualitative innature.The outline of the current article is as follows: First, we definethe key terms used in our research and elaborate on the theoretical basis—the technology acceptance model (TAM), which provides the general structure for our research model. Subsequently,we review previous work on mobile payment acceptance. Buildingon theory and extant knowledge about the phenomenon of consumer acceptance, we present our hypotheses, specifying a set offactors that are proposed to directly or indirectly determine consumers’ intention to use mobile payment solutions. In the sectionon methods, we describe the survey and discuss the validity andreliability of the empirical data. We then present our substantiveresults and stability checks. The paper closes with a summary ofthe key findings and a discussion of the implications of theresearch