The word “biodiversity” is a term heard with increasing frequency in the ongoing debate
over how best to protect the world’s environment, and more specifically, how to preserve its rapidly
dwindling numbers of plant and animal species. In very general terms, “biodiversity” refers to the
numbers plant and animal species that can be found in a particular habitat or ecosystem. This is
apparently a very simple concept, but the simplicity of it belies its significance. A better popular
understanding of the real meaning of biodiversity and of its importance to the circumstances in
which we presently find ourselves is critical to the success of efforts to protect the environment, and
therefore essential to our own survival.
Global biodiversity, which is the total number of plant and animal species existing on the
planet at any one time, can only be estimated; and only very roughly estimated at that. Undoubtedly,
many species remain to be discovered. Some of these, such as insects and microscopic life, are
small enough to have escaped our notice, while others dwell in areas we have only begun to explore;
the species inhabiting the deepest ocean depths, for example. It must also be remembered that we
are in the midst of a mass extinction event. Species are now disappearing at a rate estimated to be
between 1,000 and 10,000 times faster than the average for the history of life on earth. Taken
together, these two uncertain elements prevent the global biodiversity estimate from becoming
much more than an educated guess. The current best estimate is somewhere in the neighborhood of
100 to 200 million species.
This number, while it may be of some interest to nonscientists, isn’t of much real value to
researchers. They are generally more concerned with local biodiversity. Despite the apparent
enormity of the number of species that inhabit the earth as a whole, local biodiversity - the number
of species found in any one habitat - fluctuates greatly as we cross the boundaries separating the
ecosystems that make up the Earth’s biosphere. It reaches its highest levels on the coral reefs and in
the tropical rain forests where there may be thousands of species per acre.
Of course, it is this value - the measure of local biodiversity - that is most useful for anyone
concerned with assessing the health of an ecosystem or protecting it from destruction. In measuring
the biodiversity of a particular ecosystem, biologists are usually quite impartial when weighing the
relative significance of each species. Most are assigned a value of one, the total number of species
then representing the target value. However, there are two conditions under which one species may
be weighted more heavily than others. This would certainly be the case for any species that by virtue
of its genetic uniqueness would constitute a special loss to the global gene pool in the event of its
extinction. The tuatara is a good example of just such a species. As the only surviving member of a
TRƯỜNG PTTH LƯƠNG THẾ VINH Trang 4/8 - Mã đề thi 314
family of reptiles that, except for it, died out 60 million years ago, the tuatara qualifies on grounds
of genetic uniqueness to be weighted more heavily in calculating the biodiversity of its habitat.
A species may be accorded bonus points in the biodiversity equation for another reason as
well; it may be deemed more significant by virtue of the role it plays in the ecosystem. An example
of this would be the California sea otter. [1] The preferred food of this species of marine mammal is
the sea urchin; a marine invertebrate, which feeds on a certain type of sea grass known as kelp. [2]
Were it not for the otter’s contribution in controlling the sea urchin population, the undersea kelp
forest would surely be decimated by a dramatic increase in the population of sea urchins. [3] This
would remove a key supporting element – the kelp – from the habitat of many fish and invertebrate
species that depend on it. [4] This, in turn, would fundamentally alter an entire undersea habitat and
undoubtedly put a risk a number of different species that have adapted to its peculiar characteristics.
Therefore, the behavior of the otter in actively maintaining the local diversity of species dictates that
it should be assigned a higher biodiversity value.
Question 51: What was the author’s main purpose in writing the passage?
A. To explain why biodiversity is essential to our survival.
B. To explain the concept of biodiversity.
C. To show why local biodiversity is more important than global biodiversity.
D. To clarify the dangers that result from declining biodiversity.
Question 52: The word “dwindling” in the passage is closest in meaning to
A. extinct B. diverse C. proliferating D. diminishing
Question 53: It is implied in the passage that we don’t have an accurate measure of global
biodiversity because
A. the number of species is constantly changing.
B. populations of animals move from place to place.
C. we don’t know the ecological role played by all species.
D. the definition of biodiversity is not clear enough.
Question 54: The word “enormity” in the passage is closest in the meaning to
A. important B. quality C. vastness D. accuracy
Question 55: According to the passage, the largest number of species would be found
A. on the coral reefs.
B. in the boundary areas between local systems.
C. in the undersea kelp forests.
D. in fresh water lakes and streams.
Question 56: According to the passage, which of the following is NOT important in assessing
biodiversity?
A. The special function a particular species plays in an ecosystem.
B. The number of species present in an ecosystem.
C. The genetic uniqueness of the species within an ecosystem.
D. The size of the area an ecosystem covers.
Question 57: The author mentioned the sea urchin in the last paragraph in order to
A. illustrate the richness of life in California waters.
B. illustrate the special importance of a particular species.
C. increase the reader’s awareness of the sea urchin’s endangered status.
D. advocate the protection for the kelp forest environment.
Question 58: The word “impartial” in the passage is closest in meaning to
A. neutral B. subjective C. theoretical D. uncertain
Question 59: Which of the following statements is supported by the passage?
A. Local biodiversity may change, but global biodiversity does not.
B. All species have the same significance when considering biodiversity.
C. The concept of biodiversity is of little value to ecologists.
D. The earth is experiencing a reduction in global biodiversity.
The word “biodiversity” is a term heard with increasing frequency in the ongoing debateover how best to protect the world’s environment, and more specifically, how to preserve its rapidlydwindling numbers of plant and animal species. In very general terms, “biodiversity” refers to thenumbers plant and animal species that can be found in a particular habitat or ecosystem. This isapparently a very simple concept, but the simplicity of it belies its significance. A better popularunderstanding of the real meaning of biodiversity and of its importance to the circumstances inwhich we presently find ourselves is critical to the success of efforts to protect the environment, andtherefore essential to our own survival.Global biodiversity, which is the total number of plant and animal species existing on theplanet at any one time, can only be estimated; and only very roughly estimated at that. Undoubtedly,many species remain to be discovered. Some of these, such as insects and microscopic life, aresmall enough to have escaped our notice, while others dwell in areas we have only begun to explore;the species inhabiting the deepest ocean depths, for example. It must also be remembered that weare in the midst of a mass extinction event. Species are now disappearing at a rate estimated to bebetween 1,000 and 10,000 times faster than the average for the history of life on earth. Takentogether, these two uncertain elements prevent the global biodiversity estimate from becomingmuch more than an educated guess. The current best estimate is somewhere in the neighborhood of100 to 200 million species.This number, while it may be of some interest to nonscientists, isn’t of much real value toresearchers. They are generally more concerned with local biodiversity. Despite the apparentenormity of the number of species that inhabit the earth as a whole, local biodiversity - the numberof species found in any one habitat - fluctuates greatly as we cross the boundaries separating theecosystems that make up the Earth’s biosphere. It reaches its highest levels on the coral reefs and inthe tropical rain forests where there may be thousands of species per acre.Of course, it is this value - the measure of local biodiversity - that is most useful for anyoneconcerned with assessing the health of an ecosystem or protecting it from destruction. In measuringthe biodiversity of a particular ecosystem, biologists are usually quite impartial when weighing therelative significance of each species. Most are assigned a value of one, the total number of speciesthen representing the target value. However, there are two conditions under which one species maybe weighted more heavily than others. This would certainly be the case for any species that by virtueof its genetic uniqueness would constitute a special loss to the global gene pool in the event of itsextinction. The tuatara is a good example of just such a species. As the only surviving member of a TRƯỜNG PTTH LƯƠNG THẾ VINH Trang 4/8 - Mã đề thi 314 family of reptiles that, except for it, died out 60 million years ago, the tuatara qualifies on groundsof genetic uniqueness to be weighted more heavily in calculating the biodiversity of its habitat.A species may be accorded bonus points in the biodiversity equation for another reason aswell; it may be deemed more significant by virtue of the role it plays in the ecosystem. An exampleof this would be the California sea otter. [1] The preferred food of this species of marine mammal isthe sea urchin; a marine invertebrate, which feeds on a certain type of sea grass known as kelp. [2]Were it not for the otter’s contribution in controlling the sea urchin population, the undersea kelpforest would surely be decimated by a dramatic increase in the population of sea urchins. [3] Thiswould remove a key supporting element – the kelp – from the habitat of many fish and invertebratespecies that depend on it. [4] This, in turn, would fundamentally alter an entire undersea habitat andundoubtedly put a risk a number of different species that have adapted to its peculiar characteristics.Therefore, the behavior of the otter in actively maintaining the local diversity of species dictates thatit should be assigned a higher biodiversity value. Question 51: What was the author’s main purpose in writing the passage?A. To explain why biodiversity is essential to our survival.B. To explain the concept of biodiversity.C. To show why local biodiversity is more important than global biodiversity.D. To clarify the dangers that result from declining biodiversity.Question 52: The word “dwindling” in the passage is closest in meaning toA. extinct B. diverse C. proliferating D. diminishingQuestion 53: It is implied in the passage that we don’t have an accurate measure of globalbiodiversity becauseA. the number of species is constantly changing.B. populations of animals move from place to place.C. we don’t know the ecological role played by all species.D. the definition of biodiversity is not clear enough.Question 54: The word “enormity” in the passage is closest in the meaning toA. important B. quality C. vastness D. accuracyQuestion 55: According to the passage, the largest number of species would be foundA. on the coral reefs.B. in the boundary areas between local systems.C. in the undersea kelp forests.D. in fresh water lakes and streams.Question 56: According to the passage, which of the following is NOT important in assessingbiodiversity?A. The special function a particular species plays in an ecosystem.B. The number of species present in an ecosystem.C. The genetic uniqueness of the species within an ecosystem.D. The size of the area an ecosystem covers.
Question 57: The author mentioned the sea urchin in the last paragraph in order to
A. illustrate the richness of life in California waters.
B. illustrate the special importance of a particular species.
C. increase the reader’s awareness of the sea urchin’s endangered status.
D. advocate the protection for the kelp forest environment.
Question 58: The word “impartial” in the passage is closest in meaning to
A. neutral B. subjective C. theoretical D. uncertain
Question 59: Which of the following statements is supported by the passage?
A. Local biodiversity may change, but global biodiversity does not.
B. All species have the same significance when considering biodiversity.
C. The concept of biodiversity is of little value to ecologists.
D. The earth is experiencing a reduction in global biodiversity.
正在翻譯中..