More important than simply determin

More important than simply determining the supply chain strategies in Table 4,
we wish to assess the degree of fit between the product characteristics and each
strategy. To do this, we examine the two product characteristics factors labeled
Functional and Innovative, as shown in the Appendix. The Functional scale is
labeled as such because the two items that load highly are both associated with
more functional products (Fisher, 1997; Selldin & Olhager, 2007). Namely, PC3
asks about the volume of each product type with higher responses indicating higher
volume and PC4 asks about the length of the introduction interval with a higher
number indicating longer intervals for new production introductions. In both cases,
the high loadings fit with a more functional product. The second scale is labeled as
Innovative because the two items that load highly are associated with innovative
products (Fisher, 1997; Selldin & Olhager, 2007). PC1 addresses the variation in
demand for each product, with higher responses equating to high variability, while
PC2 addresses the time-to-market with high responses equating to shorter times.
The high loadings fit well with an innovative product. As shown in the Appendix,
the two factors explain 67.3% of the variance.
Table 6 provides the results of an ANOVA of the two product characteristics
based on the supply chain strategy group from Table 4. The data generally fit
with the predictions of Fisher (1997) and Selldin and Olhager (2007). In particular,
the lean strategy group has the lowest value for Innovative and a relatively

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

More important than simply determining the supply chain strategies in Table 4,we wish to assess the degree of fit between the product characteristics and eachstrategy. To do this, we examine the two product characteristics factors labeledFunctional and Innovative, as shown in the Appendix. The Functional scale islabeled as such because the two items that load highly are both associated withmore functional products (Fisher, 1997; Selldin & Olhager, 2007). Namely, PC3asks about the volume of each product type with higher responses indicating highervolume and PC4 asks about the length of the introduction interval with a highernumber indicating longer intervals for new production introductions. In both cases,the high loadings fit with a more functional product. The second scale is labeled asInnovative because the two items that load highly are associated with innovativeproducts (Fisher, 1997; Selldin & Olhager, 2007). PC1 addresses the variation indemand for each product, with higher responses equating to high variability, whilePC2 addresses the time-to-market with high responses equating to shorter times.The high loadings fit well with an innovative product. As shown in the Appendix,the two factors explain 67.3% of the variance.Table 6 provides the results of an ANOVA of the two product characteristicsbased on the supply chain strategy group from Table 4. The data generally fit與費雪 (1997 年) 和 Selldin 和 Olhager (2007 年) 的預測。尤其是，精益策略小組具有最低值為創新和相對

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

更重要的不是簡單地確定所述供應鏈策略在表4中，
我們希望評估擬合的產品特性和每個之間的程度
的策略。要做到這一點，我們研究這兩種產品特性的因素標記
功能和創新，如在附錄中。功能性規模被
打成這樣，因為兩個項目加載高度都與相關聯的
更多的功能性產品（費舍爾，1997; Selldin＆Olhager，2007）。也就是說，PC3
詢問具有更高的反應表明較高的每一個產品類型的體積
量和PC4詢問引進區間具有較高的長度
數字，指示新引進的生產週期較長。在這兩種情況下，
高負荷適合與一個以上官能產物。第二標尺標記為
創新，因為這兩個項加載高度與創新相關的
產品信息（費舍爾，1997; Selldin＆Olhager，2007）。PC1解決在變化
的每個產品，具有較高的反應等同於高變異性需求，同時
解決了PC2的時間向市場推出高反應等同於較短的時間。
高負荷十分符合創新產品。如圖中附錄，
這兩個因素解釋變異的67.3％。
表6提供的兩款產品特性的方差分析結果
基礎上，供應鏈戰略組從表4中的數據通常適合
與費舍爾的預測（ 1997年）和Selldin和Olhager（2007）。尤其是，
稀燃策略組具有創新和相對的最低值