Relationships amongst Preschool Teachers’ Emotional Labor, Psychological Capital, and Job Involvement All relationships amongst the three constructs of emotional labor, Psychological Capital, and Job Involvement (Table 1) as well as the relationships of Work Involvement with Hope, Optimism, Resilience, and Deep Emotion Action (which were not significant) exhibited between-variable correlations between .083 and 334. These results indicated that the value preschool teachers obtained from their jobs and the importance they perceived their jobs to have in their lives did not change because of their individual Hope, Optimim, or Resilience scores. Although the preschool teachers may have had superior strategies for adjusting their emotions, the resulting scores were not related to the value obtained from their jobs. Furthermore, the correlations of Job Involvement with Variety of Emotions, Requirement of Emotional Expression, and Self-efficacy were negative. Both Variety of Emotions and Requirement of Emotional Expression was job-focused Emotional Labor; in other words, they entail expressing emotions in response to different work situations and to meet expectations for their role at work. Therefore, when expectations of the preschool teachers’ emotions were high, their perceived value at work was low. In other words, the more preschool teachers had to change their emotional expression according to the needs of situations at work, the less they could devote themselves to the actual work of preschool teaching. The correlation between WI and Self was negative. Lawler and Hall (1970) suggested that people’s Job Involvement is the importance of work in their lives. People with high Job Involvement can be influenced because they perceive their jobs to be a crucial part of their self-worth. The results of this study show that the higher the preschool teachers’ perceived value of their job and their perceived importance of the job in their lives were, the lower their perceived Self was. The preschool teachers’ perceived value at work and their Self were not consistent; therefore, the correlation was negative.