The results of our study regarding

The results of our study regarding knowledge of the participants are similar to Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES‑9) study[13] which also reflects the poor knowledge and awareness about diabetes among the Chennai population. There was a misconception among 72% of our study participants that all bitter substances can treat diabetes against 53% which was seen in a study done by Shah et al. in Saurashtra.[8] Eighty‑two percent knew the methods to diagnose diabetes mellitus which was slightly different from findings in a study done by Gupta et al.[14] where 90% of the study population in the rural area knew about accurate methods to diagnose diabetes.Again, knowledge regarding complications of diabetes was also poor, which was also similar to CURES study.[13] Only 30% of the participants knew that diabetes can cause ophthalmic problems against 15% of the participants in CURES study. Even more, worse was their knowledge on diabetes causing neuropathy and skin infections. The results obtained in our study regarding the knowledge on complications were different from the results obtained by Mehta et al.,[15] who observed that 82% of his study subjects had knowledge about the disease and its complications.It was observed that mean composite knowledge score was better in the 30–49 years age group, being a professional and belonging to upper class. This finding is similar to the one done by Adibe et al.[16] with respect to the age group who also found that younger the age group, better the knowledge. It was also seen that those with

結果 (繁體中文) 1:

我們研究的有關參與者的知識的結果與奈城鄉流行病學研究（CURES-9）的研究[13]這也反映了清奈人口中糖尿病窮人的了解和認識。有在我們的研究參與者的72％，所有的苦味物質能夠治療糖尿病針對其在由Shah等人所做的一項研究看到53％的誤解。在索拉什特拉。[8] 百分之八十二知道的方法來診斷糖尿病這是從古普塔等人所做的一項研究結果略有不同。[14] 其中90％在農村地區的研究人群的知道準確的方法來診斷糖尿病。

此外，有糖尿病知識方面的並發症也差，這也類似於CURES的研究。[13] 只有30％的參與者知道糖尿病會引起反對CURES研究的參與者中15％的眼科問題。更有甚者，更糟糕的是他們對引起神經病變和皮膚感染的糖尿病知識。在我們對上並發症知識研究獲得的結果是由梅塔等人得到的結果不同，誰看到他的研究對象中，有82％[15]中，關於該疾病及其並發症的知識。

據觀察，平均綜合知識得分為更好的30-49歲年齡組中，作為職業球員，屬於上層階級。這一發現是一個類似於由Adibe等人完成的。[16] 相對於該年齡組誰也發現，年輕的年齡組，更好的知識。也有人看到那些

結果 (繁體中文) 2:

Chúng tôi sẽ cố gắng hàng hóa giao hàng tốt nhất của chúng tôi cho nhận ngày hôm nay lúc nửa đêm. Sẽ giữ cho bạn được đăng
Đơn đặt hàng mẫu với chữ ký chúng tôi gửi cho bạn, pls tìm attd tập tin.

結果 (繁體中文) 3:

我們關於參與者知識的研究結果與金奈城鄉流行病學研究（治癒9例）研究[13]相似，這也反映了金奈人口對糖尿病的知識和認識不足。在我們的研究參與者中，有72%的人錯誤地認為所有苦味物質都可以治療糖尿病，而在Shah等人的一項研究中，只有53%的人認為苦味物質可以治療糖尿病。在Saurashtra，[8]82%的人知道診斷糖尿病的方法，這與Gupta等人的研究結果略有不同。[14]農村地區90%的研究人群知道診斷糖尿病的準確方法。
同樣，關於糖尿病併發症的知識也很貧乏，這也類似於治癒研究。[13]只有30%的參與者知道糖尿病會引起眼科問題，而治癒研究的參與者中只有15%知道糖尿病會引起眼科問題。更糟糕的是，他們對糖尿病引起的神經病變和皮膚感染的認識。我們在研究中獲得的關於併發症的知識與Mehta等人[15]獲得的結果不同，Mehta等人觀察到，82%的研究對象瞭解該疾病及其併發症。
研究發現，30-49歲年齡組的平均綜合知識得分較高，屬於職業人群，屬於上層階級。這一發現與Adibe等人[16]在年齡組方面所做的發現相似，後者還發現年齡組越小，知識越好。也有人看到