這篇文章在討論，當員工犯錯後是否要再給予第二次機會？ 其中包括兩個因素

這篇文章在討論，當員工犯錯後是否要再給予第二次機會？ 其中包括兩個因素， First, Uday’s lie didn’t affect his compensation. Had he earned a commission or bonus based on the false report, that would warrant termination. That is not the case here.Second, if Siddhant were to fire Uday, he might put the company at risk. 最終，公司給予Uday第二次機會。its my view that, 雇主與員工之間最重要的就是信任。他們將Uday留下來，不僅有效樹立錯誤的範例，也使Uday更積極為公司付出。此外，其他員工也會知道什麼行為是錯誤的，並且不在犯錯。如此一來，便可以大幅提升員工對公司的忠誠度。 所以這應該就是一個最圓滿的結局了

結果 (英文) 1:

In the discussion of this article, when employees make mistakes again if given a second chance? Including two factors, First, Uday's lie did not affect his compensation. Had he earned a commission or bonus based on the false report, that would warrant termination. That is not the case here.Second, if Siddhant were to fire Uday , he might put the company at risk . In the end, the company Uday given a second chance.

its my view that, the most important between employers and employees is trust. They will Uday stay, not only effectively establish the wrong paradigm, Uday also more positive for the company to pay. In addition, other employees will know what behavior is wrong, and not make mistakes. In this way, we can greatly enhance employee loyalty to the company. So this should be one of the most successful outcome of the

結果 (英文) 2:

This article discusses whether to give an employee a second chance if he or she makes a mistake. These include two factors, First, Uday's lie noted't affect his compensation. Had he earned a commission or bonus on the false report, that would d dh'r warrant. That is not the case here. Second, if Siddhant had to fire Uday, he ed put the company at risk. In the end, the company gave Uday a second chance.

Its my view it, the most important thing between employers and employees is trust. They left Uday, not only to effectively set the wrong example, but also to make Uday more active for the company. In addition, other employees will know what is wrong and not make mistakes. As a result, employeeloyalt to the company can be greatly increased. So this should be the perfect ending.

結果 (英文) 3:

This article discusses whether employees should be given a second chance when they make mistakes? First, today's lie didn't affect his compensation. Had he earned a commission or bonus based on the false report, that would warn termination. That is not the case here.second, if siddhant were to fire today, he might put the company at risk.
Its my view that, the most important thing between employers and employees is trust. They keep Uday, not only effectively setting the wrong example, but also making Uday pay more actively for the company. In addition, other employees will know what behavior is wrong and will not make mistakes. In this way, employees' loyalty to the company can be greatly improved. So this should be the best ending